Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Veronicastrum virginicum | (L.) Farw. | 487 | documented |
| Veronicastrum loshanense | Tien T.Chen & F.S.Chou | 42 | documented |
| Veronicastrum sibiricum | (L.) Pennell | 40 | documented |
| Veronicastrum formosanum | (Masam.) T.Yamaz. | 12 | documented |
| Veronicastrum axillare | (Siebold & Zucc.) T.Yamaz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veronicastrum brunonianum | (Benth.) D.Y.Hong | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veronicastrum caulopterum | (Hance) T.Yamaz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veronicastrum cerasifolium | (Monjuschko) T.Yamaz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veronicastrum latifolium | (Hemsl.) T.Yamaz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veronicastrum liukiuense | (Ohwi) T.Yamaz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veronicastrum longispicatum | (Merr.) T.Yamaz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veronicastrum noguchii | K.Uehara, K.Saiki & T.Ando | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veronicastrum rhombifolium | (Hand.-Mazz.) P.C.Tsoong | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veronicastrum robustum | (Diels) D.Y.Hong | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veronicastrum stenostachyum | (Hemsl.) T.Yamaz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veronicastrum tagawae | (Ohwi) T.Yamaz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veronicastrum tubiflorum | (Fisch. & C.A.Mey.) Soják | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veronicastrum villosulum | (Miq.) T.Yamaz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Veronicastrum yunnanense | (W.W.Sm.) T.Yamaz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.