Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trema orientale | (L.) Blume | 470 | documented |
| Trema tomentosum | (Roxb.) H.Hara | 343 | documented |
| Trema micranthum | (L.) Blume | 163 | documented |
| Trema cannabina | Lour. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Trema amboinensis | (Willd.) Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trema andersonii | (Planch.) Byng & Christenh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trema angustifolium | (Planch.) Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trema aspera | (Brongn.) Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trema cubense | Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trema cubensis | Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trema discolor | (Brongn.) Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trema domingense | Urb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trema eurhynchum | (Miq.) Byng & Christenh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trema humbertii | J.-F.Leroy | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trema lamarckiana | (Schult.) Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trema levigatum | Hand.-Mazz. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trema melastomatifolium | (J.J.Sm.) Byng & Christenh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trema nitidum | C.J.Chen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trema parviflorum | (Miq.) Byng & Christenh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trema politoria | (Planch.) Blume | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Trema simulans | (Merr. & L.M.Perry) Byng & Christenh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.