Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kedrostis nana | (Lam.) Cogn. | 66 | documented |
| Kedrostis capensis | (Sond.) A.Meeuse | 42 | documented |
| Kedrostis africana | (L.) Cogn. | 24 | documented |
| Kedrostis foetidissima | (Jacq.) Cogn. | 9 | documented |
| Kedrostis leloja | (Forsk. ex J.F.Gmel.) C.Jeffrey | 9 | documented |
| Kedrostis psammophila | Bruyns | 6 | documented |
| Kedrostis abdallai | Zimm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kedrostis cogniauxii | Keraudren | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kedrostis courtallensis | (Arn.) C.Jeffrey | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kedrostis crassirostrata | Bremek. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kedrostis dissecta | Keraudren | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kedrostis elongata | Keraudren | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kedrostis gijef | (Forsk. ex J.F.Gmel.) C.Jeffrey | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kedrostis heterophylla | Zimm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kedrostis hirta | W.J.de Wilde & Duyfjes | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kedrostis lanuginosa | Keraudren | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kedrostis laxa | Keraudren | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kedrostis limpompensis | C.Jeffrey | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kedrostis monosperma | W.J.de Wilde & Duyfjes | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kedrostis perrieri | Keraudren | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kedrostis pseudogijef | (Gilg) C.Jeffrey | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Kedrostis punctulata | Cogn. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.