Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Galanthus nivalis | L. | 2,610 | documented |
| Galanthus elwesii | Hook.f. | 222 | documented |
| Galanthus woronowii | Losinsk. | 64 | documented |
| Galanthus plicatus | M.Bieb. | 34 | documented |
| Galanthus alpinus | Sosnowsky | 33 | documented |
| Galanthus reginae-olgae | Orph. | 5 | documented |
| Galanthus peshmenii | A.P.Davis & C.D.Brickell | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Galanthus platyphyllus | Traub & Moldenke | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Galanthus rizehensis | Stern | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Galanthus × valentinei | Beck | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Galanthus allenii | Baker | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Galanthus angustifolius | Koss | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Galanthus cilicicus | Baker | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Galanthus fosteri | Baker | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Galanthus gracilis | Čelak. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Galanthus ikariae | Baker | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Galanthus koenenianus | Lobin, C.D.Brickell & A.P.Davis | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Galanthus krasnovii | A.P.Khokhr. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Galanthus lagodechianus | Kemularia-Natadze | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Galanthus lagodechianus | Kem.-Nath. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Galanthus panjutinii | Zubov & A.P.Davis | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Galanthus samothracicus | Kit Tan & Biel | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Galanthus transcaucasicus | Fomin | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Galanthus trojanus | A.P.Davis & Özhatay | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.