Fragaria

Accepted species 28 Documented here 12 Family Rosaceae

Accepted species 28 in this genus

Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.

SpeciesAuthority Usable photographsPage
Fragaria vesca L. 4,264 documented
Fragaria virginiana Mill. 2,712 documented
Fragaria viridis Weston 1,016 documented
Fragaria chiloensis (L.) Mill. 689 documented
Fragaria moschata Duchesne ex Weston 258 documented
Fragaria hayatae Makino 46 documented
Fragaria cascadensis K.E.Hummer 18 documented
Fragaria orientalis Losinsk. 17 documented
Fragaria nubicola (Lindl. ex Hook.f.) Lacaita 16 documented
Fragaria nilgerrensis Schltdl. ex J.Gay 7 documented
Fragaria nipponica Makino 4 documented
Fragaria moupinensis (Franch.) Cardot 3 documented
Fragaria iinumae Makino 2 below the evidence gate
Fragaria daltoniana J.Gay 1 below the evidence gate
Fragaria × ananassa (Duchesne ex Weston) Duchesne ex Rozier 0 below the evidence gate
Fragaria bifera Duchesne 0 below the evidence gate
Fragaria bringhurstii Staudt 0 below the evidence gate
Fragaria bucharica Losinsk. 0 below the evidence gate
Fragaria chinensis Losinsk. 0 below the evidence gate
Fragaria corymbosa Losinsk. 0 below the evidence gate
Fragaria emeiensis J.J.Lei 0 below the evidence gate
Fragaria gracilis Losinsk. 0 below the evidence gate
Fragaria intermedia (Bach) Beck 0 below the evidence gate
Fragaria iturupensis Staudt 0 below the evidence gate
Fragaria mandshurica Staudt 0 below the evidence gate
Fragaria pentaphylla Losinsk. 0 below the evidence gate
Fragaria tayulinensis S.S.Ying 0 below the evidence gate
Fragaria tibetica Staudt & Dickoré 0 below the evidence gate

Why some species have no pagethe gate

This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.

So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. Accepted names, authorities, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. Photograph counts, restricted to CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA. Retrieved 2026-06-27.