Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flueggea virosa | (Roxb. ex Willd.) Royle | 324 | documented |
| Flueggea leucopyrus | Willd. | 32 | documented |
| Flueggea suffruticosa | (Pall.) Baill. | 30 | documented |
| Flueggea tinctoria | (L.) G.L.Webster | 20 | documented |
| Flueggea verrucosa | (Thunb.) G.L.Webster | 8 | documented |
| Flueggea acicularis | (Croizat) G.L.Webster | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flueggea acidoton | (L.) G.L.Webster | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flueggea anatolica | Gemici | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flueggea elliptica | (Spreng.) Baill. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flueggea flexuosa | Müll.Arg. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flueggea gracilis | (Merr.) Petra Hoffm. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flueggea jullienii | (Beille) G.L.Webster | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flueggea monticola | G.L.Webster | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flueggea neowawraea | W.J.Hayden | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flueggea schuechiana | (Müll.Arg.) G.L.Webster | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flueggea spirei | Beille | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flueggea taiwanensis | S.S.Ying | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Flueggea ussuriensis | Pojark. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.