Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enneapogon desvauxii | P.Beauv. | 108 | documented |
| Enneapogon cenchroides | (Licht.) C.E.Hubb. | 90 | documented |
| Enneapogon nigricans | (R.Br.) P.Beauv. | 41 | documented |
| Enneapogon avenaceus | (Lindl.) C.E.Hubb. | 35 | documented |
| Enneapogon scaber | Lehm. | 29 | documented |
| Enneapogon cylindricus | N.T.Burb. | 25 | documented |
| Enneapogon lindleyanus | (Domin) C.E.Hubb. | 22 | documented |
| Enneapogon scoparius | Stapf | 21 | documented |
| Enneapogon pretoriensis | Stent | 16 | documented |
| Enneapogon polyphyllus | (Domin) N.T.Burb. | 13 | documented |
| Enneapogon decipiens | Kakudidi | 5 | documented |
| Enneapogon purpurascens | (R.Br.) P.Beauv. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Enneapogon robustissimus | (Domin) N.T.Burb. | 2 | below the evidence gate |
| Enneapogon intermedius | N.T.Burb. | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Enneapogon asperatus | C.E.Hubb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Enneapogon caerulescens | (Gaudich.) N.T.Burb. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Enneapogon eremophilus | Kakudidi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Enneapogon foxii | (Post) Valdés & H.Scholz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Enneapogon gracilis | (R.Br.) P.Beauv. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Enneapogon limpopoensis | Mashau | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Enneapogon lophotrichus | Chiov. ex H.Scholz & P.König | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Enneapogon pallidus | (R.Br.) P.Beauv. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Enneapogon persicus | Boiss. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Enneapogon spathaceus | Gooss. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Enneapogon truncatus | Kakudidi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Enneapogon virens | (Lindl.) Kakudidi | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.