Every accepted species in the genus is listed. A name links to its page when we hold at least three commercially licensed photographs of it. Where we do not, the row shows how many we actually found, which is usually none.
| Species | Authority | Usable photographs | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecbolium ligustrinum | (Vahl) Vollesen | 30 | documented |
| Ecbolium glabratum | Vollesen | 14 | documented |
| Ecbolium viride | (Forssk.) Alston | 1 | below the evidence gate |
| Ecbolium albiflorum | Vollesen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ecbolium amplexicaule | S.Moore | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ecbolium barlerioides | (S.Moore) Lindau | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ecbolium benoistii | Vollesen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ecbolium boranense | Vollesen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ecbolium clarkei | Hiern | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ecbolium fimbriatum | Benoist | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ecbolium flanaganii | C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ecbolium gymnostachyum | (Nees) Milne-Redh. | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ecbolium hastatum | Vollesen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ecbolium humbertii | Vollesen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ecbolium madagascariense | Vollesen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ecbolium oblongifolium | Vollesen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ecbolium palmatum | Vollesen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ecbolium spicatum | (Nees) Kuntze | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ecbolium strictum | O.Schwartz | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ecbolium subcordatum | C.B.Clarke | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ecbolium syringifolium | (Vahl) Vollesen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
| Ecbolium tanzaniense | Vollesen | 0 | below the evidence gate |
This site is commercial, so it can only publish photographs licensed for commercial use. Roughly three quarters of the photographs on iNaturalist are CC BY-NC, which excludes them. A species needs at least three usable photographs before we will build it a page, because a page with one picture and no traits tells you nothing you could not get from a search result, and generating hundreds of thousands of those is precisely the practice that got the previous version of this site deleted.
So the species above without a link are not errors and they are not omissions. They are real, accepted plants that we cannot yet document to the standard we hold ourselves to, and the count in the photographs column is exactly how far short we fall.