Tournefortia sibiricaL.

WFO wfo-0000410972 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Tournefortia sibirica, photographed by KAnatoliy
fig. a KAnatoliy, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-06-11 / obs. 205070569

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 23 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Argusia cimmerica Steven
  • Argusia messerschmidia Steven
  • Argusia rosmarinifolia (Roem. & Schult.) Steven
  • Argusia sibirica (L.) Dandy
  • Arguzia cimmerica Steven
  • Arguzia messerschmidia Steven
  • Arguzia repens Raf.
  • Arguzia rosmarinifolia Steven
  • Heliotropium japonicum A.Gray
  • Messerschmidia argusia L.
  • Messerschmidia arguzia L.
  • Messerschmidia rosmarinifolia Roem. & Schult.
  • Messerschmidia sibirica (L.) L.
  • Messerschmidia sibirica subsp. angustior (DC.) Kitag.
  • Messerschmidia sibirica var. angustior (DC.) W.T.Wang
  • Messerschmidia sibirica var. latifolia (DC.) H.Hara
  • Messerschmidia sibirica var. rosmarinifolia (Turcz.) Popov
  • Tournefortia arguzia Roem. & Schult.
  • Tournefortia arguzia var. angustior DC.
  • Tournefortia arguzia var. latifolia DC.
  • Tournefortia sibirica var. grandifolia H.J.P.Winkl.
  • Tournefortia sibirica var. rosmarinifolia Turcz.
  • Tournefortia sibirica var. sibirica

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.