Tillandsia strictaSol. ex Ker Gawl.

WFO wfo-0000585601 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC0 / CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Tillandsia stricta, photographed by JG
fig. a JG, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-01-17 / obs. 200626074

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Native range 12 botanical countries

Regions where Tillandsia stricta is native: Argentina Northeast, Bolivia, Brazil Northeast, Brazil South, Brazil Southeast, Colombia, Guyana, Paraguay, Suriname, Trinidad-Tobago, Uruguay, Venezuela Argentina NortheastBoliviaBrazil NortheastBrazil SouthBrazil SoutheastColombiaGuyanaParaguaySurinameTrinidad-TobagoUruguayVenezuela
Native distribution of Tillandsia stricta, after Kew’s World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Introduced, extinct and doubtful records are excluded, so this is where the plant is from, not everywhere it now grows.
RegionTDWG codeContinent
Argentina Northeast AGE SOUTHERN AMERICA
Bolivia BOL
Brazil Northeast BZE
Brazil South BZS
Brazil Southeast BZL
Colombia CLM
Guyana GUY
Paraguay PAR
Suriname SUR
Trinidad-Tobago TRT
Uruguay URU
Venezuela VEN

Region boundaries approximated from Natural Earth (public domain) and mapped to TDWG World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (WGSRPD) level-3 botanical countries (Brummitt 2001). Indicative, not the official WGSRPD geometry.

Flowering 370 in flower of 538 examined

Proportion of examined Tillandsia stricta in flower, by month
Month In flower Examined Share 95% interval
Jan 71 93 76% 67% to 84%
Feb 31 47 66% 52% to 78%
Mar 25 39 64% 48% to 77%
Apr 40 70 57% 45% to 68%
May 14 27 52% 34% to 69%
Jun 13 26 50% 32% to 68%
Jul 10 19 53% 32% to 73%
Aug 16 21 76% 55% to 89%
Sep 43 54 80% 67% to 88%
Oct 36 46 78% 64% to 88%
Nov 38 48 79% 66% to 88%
Dec 33 48 69% 55% to 80%

Peak flowering in Sep. Each bar is the share of Tillandsia stricta observations in which someone actually recorded the reproductive state and found the plant in flower, not the raw number of flowering records. That distinction matters: people observe plants far more in spring than in winter, so a bare count of flowering records partly measures when people go outside. Dividing by the number examined removes that. 370 of 538 examined observations were in flower, every one of them research grade. The whisker on each bar is a 95% Wilson interval. This is still a global aggregate and not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres. Where a species has fewer than 30 flowering records we do not draw this chart at all. Computed from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Also published as 13 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Anoplophytum bicolor Beer
  • Anoplophytum krameri (André) É.Morren ex Baker
  • Anoplophytum strictum (Sol. ex Ker Gawl.) Beer
  • Anoplophytum strictum var. krameri André
  • Tillandsia conspersa Miq.
  • Tillandsia krameri (André) Baker
  • Tillandsia langsdorffii Mez
  • Tillandsia pulchella var. rosea (Lindl.) Mez
  • Tillandsia rosea Lindl.
  • Tillandsia stricta f. nivea Leme
  • Tillandsia stricta var. albiflora H.Hrom. & Rauh
  • Tillandsia stricta var. krameri (André) Mez
  • Tillandsia stricta var. stricta

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
  3. Kew, World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP v16). native distribution by TDWG level-3 botanical country, and life form. CC BY 3.0. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.