Plate 1 figs. a–d · 1 observation
This species has been photographed under an open licence only 1 time, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.
Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.
Also published as 19 synonyms
A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.
- Splachnum ampullaceum var. bavaricum (Brid.) Brid.
- Splachnum bavaricum Brid.
- Splachnum gracile Dicks.
- Splachnum intermedium Drumm.
- Splachnum longisetum Schrank ex Schkuhr
- Splachnum ovatum Dicks. ex Hedw.
- Splachnum ovatum var. sphaericum (Hedw.) Dixon
- Splachnum pedunculatum Lindb.
- Splachnum pedunculatum subsp. sphaericum (Hedw.) Lindb.
- Splachnum pedunculatum var. sphaericum (Hedw.) Braithw.
- Splachnum pusillum P.Beauv.
- Splachnum refractum Brid.
- Splachnum sphaericum var. elongatum Drumm.
- Splachnum sphaericum var. gracile (Dicks.) F.Weber & D.Mohr
- Splachnum sphaericum var. minus Wahlenb.
- Splachnum sphaericum var. ovatum (Dicks. ex Hedw.) Hartm.
- Splachnum sphaericum var. pedunculatum (Lindb.) Jørg.
- Splachnum sphaericum var. pubescens Hartm.
- Splachnum sphaericum var. viride Hartm.
Sourcesevery claim on this page
- World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
- iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
- Wikidata. common name (P1843), joined on the World Flora Online identifier (P7715). CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-13.
We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.