Sphagnum junghuhnianumDozy & Molk.

Junghuhn's sphagnum

WFO wfo-0001185907 Accepted WFO 2026-06 7 photographs CC BY / CC BY-SA

Plate 1 figs. a–g · 3 observations

This species has been photographed under an open licence only 3 times, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.

Sphagnum junghuhnianum, photographed by Rohit
fig. a Rohit, CC BY-SA 4.0 / 2017-02-25 / obs. 69908224

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 12 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Sphagnum gedeanum Dozy & Molk.
  • Sphagnum junghuhnianum f. roseum M.Fleisch.
  • Sphagnum junghuhnianum subsp. junghuhnianum
  • Sphagnum junghuhnianum subsp. pseudomolle (Warnst.) H.Suzuki
  • Sphagnum junghuhnianum var. gedeanum (Dozy & Molk.) Warnst.
  • Sphagnum junghuhnianum var. pseudomolle (Warnst.) Warnst.
  • Sphagnum junghuhnianum var. semiporosum Dixon
  • Sphagnum kiiense Warnst.
  • Sphagnum molle var. junghuhnianum (Dozy & Molk.) Röll
  • Sphagnum pseudomolle Warnst.
  • Sphagnum squarrosiforme Dixon & Sherrin
  • Sphagnum thomsonii Müll.Hal.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
  3. Wikidata. common name (P1843), joined on the World Flora Online identifier (P7715). CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-13.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.