Solanum retroflexumDunal

black nightshadewonderberry

WFO wfo-0001030827 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC BY / CC BY-SA

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Solanum retroflexum, photographed by Manuel R Popp
fig. a Manuel R Popp, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-02-17 / obs. 179724991

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Native range 12 botanical countries

Regions where Solanum retroflexum is native: Botswana, Cape Provinces, Eswatini, Free State, KwaZulu-Natal, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, Northern Provinces, Zambia, Zimbabwe BotswanaCape ProvincesEswatiniFree StateKwaZulu-NatalLesothoMalawiMozambiqueNamibiaNorthern ProvincesZambiaZimbabwe
Native distribution of Solanum retroflexum, after Kew’s World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Introduced, extinct and doubtful records are excluded, so this is where the plant is from, not everywhere it now grows.
RegionTDWG codeContinent
Botswana BOT AFRICA
Cape Provinces CPP
Eswatini SWZ
Free State OFS
KwaZulu-Natal NAT
Lesotho LES
Malawi MLW
Mozambique MOZ
Namibia NAM
Northern Provinces TVL
Zambia ZAM
Zimbabwe ZIM

Region boundaries approximated from Natural Earth (public domain) and mapped to TDWG World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (WGSRPD) level-3 botanical countries (Brummitt 2001). Indicative, not the official WGSRPD geometry.

Flowering 40 in flower of 60 examined

Proportion of examined Solanum retroflexum in flower, by month
Month In flower Examined Share 95% interval
Jan 8 9 89% 56% to 98%
Feb 8 14 57% 33% to 79%
Mar 5 8 63% 31% to 86%
Apr 7 11 64% 35% to 85%
May 3 4 too few examined
Jun 0 0 too few examined
Jul 0 1 too few examined
Aug 0 1 too few examined
Sep 2 3 too few examined
Oct 2 3 too few examined
Nov 3 3 too few examined
Dec 2 3 too few examined

Peak flowering in Jan. Each bar is the share of Solanum retroflexum observations in which someone actually recorded the reproductive state and found the plant in flower, not the raw number of flowering records. That distinction matters: people observe plants far more in spring than in winter, so a bare count of flowering records partly measures when people go outside. Dividing by the number examined removes that. 40 of 60 examined observations were in flower, every one of them research grade. The whisker on each bar is a 95% Wilson interval. 8 months have fewer than 5 examined observations, so no proportion is drawn for them. This is still a global aggregate and not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres. Where a species has fewer than 30 flowering records we do not draw this chart at all. Computed from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Also published as 8 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Solanum burbankii Bitter
  • Solanum burbankii var. glabrescens Polg.
  • Solanum kraussianum Buchinger ex Krauss
  • Solanum nigrum var. burbankii (Bitter) Filov
  • Solanum nigrum var. probstii Polg.
  • Solanum retroflexum var. angustifolium Dunal
  • Solanum retroflexum var. latifolium Dunal
  • Solanum retroflexum var. retroflexum

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
  3. Wikidata. common name (P1843), joined on the World Flora Online identifier (P7715). CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-13.
  4. Kew, World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP v16). native distribution by TDWG level-3 botanical country, and life form. CC BY 3.0. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.