Senecio scandens(L.) Buch.-Ham.

WFO wfo-0000750656 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Senecio scandens, photographed by Chen Jia Hong
fig. a Chen Jia Hong, CC BY 4.0 / 2021-11-25 / obs. 170154459
Senecio scandens, photographed by Jacy Chen
fig. b Jacy Chen, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 129983983
Senecio scandens, photographed by Meng-Ying Tsai
fig. c Meng-Ying Tsai, CC0 1.0 / obs. 112771816
Senecio scandens, photographed by Jacy Chen
fig. d Jacy Chen, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 110883946
Senecio scandens, photographed by Hazel Chang
fig. e Hazel Chang, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 156590035
Senecio scandens, photographed by 國立臺灣博物館
fig. f 國立臺灣博物館, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 56614305
Senecio scandens, photographed by fagushayata
fig. g fagushayata, CC BY-SA 4.0 / obs. 32002474
Senecio scandens, photographed by portioid
fig. h portioid, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 14498766

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 9 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Cineraria chinensis Spreng.
  • Senecio campylodes DC.
  • Senecio campylodes var. campylodes
  • Senecio crataegifolius Hayata
  • Senecio flexicaulis Edgew.
  • Senecio hibernus Makino
  • Senecio hindsii Benth.
  • Senecio intermedius Wight
  • Senecio stipulatus Wall. ex DC.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.