Schistidium flaccidum(De Not.) Ochyra

WFO wfo-0001198373 Accepted WFO 2026-06 5 photographs CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–e · 1 observation

This species has been photographed under an open licence only 1 time, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.

Schistidium flaccidum, photographed by Christian Berg
fig. a Christian Berg, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-01-03 / obs. 176151816

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 9 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Anictangium flaccidum De Not.
  • Anoectangium flaccidum De Not. ex J.A.Knapp
  • Grimmia aethiopica Müll.Hal.
  • Grimmia canariensis (H.Winter) Broth.
  • Grimmia flaccida (De Not.) Lindb.
  • Grimmia winteri Luisier
  • Schistidium canariense H.Winter
  • Schistidium pulvinatum var. eifflense Huebener
  • Schistidium pulvinatum var. flaccidum (De Not.) De Not.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.