Salvia carneaKunth

WFO wfo-0000300599 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC BY / CC BY-SA

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Salvia carnea, photographed by harrier
fig. a harrier, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-04-23 / obs. 201694633

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Native range 11 botanical countries

Regions where Salvia carnea is native: Mexico Central, Mexico Gulf, Mexico Northeast, Mexico Southeast, Mexico Southwest, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Panamá, Venezuela Mexico CentralMexico GulfMexico NortheastMexico SoutheastMexico SouthwestColombiaCosta RicaEcuadorGuatemalaPanamáVenezuela
Native distribution of Salvia carnea, after Kew’s World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Introduced, extinct and doubtful records are excluded, so this is where the plant is from, not everywhere it now grows.
RegionTDWG codeContinent
Colombia CLM SOUTHERN AMERICA
Costa Rica COS
Ecuador ECU
Guatemala GUA
Panamá PAN
Venezuela VEN
Mexico Central MXC NORTHERN AMERICA
Mexico Gulf MXG
Mexico Northeast MXE
Mexico Southeast MXT
Mexico Southwest MXS

Region boundaries approximated from Natural Earth (public domain) and mapped to TDWG World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (WGSRPD) level-3 botanical countries (Brummitt 2001). Indicative, not the official WGSRPD geometry.

Flowering 270 in flower of 274 examined

Proportion of examined Salvia carnea in flower, by month
Month In flower Examined Share 95% interval
Jan 51 51 100% 93% to 100%
Feb 48 48 100% 93% to 100%
Mar 13 13 100% 77% to 100%
Apr 1 2 too few examined
May 2 3 too few examined
Jun 5 5 100% 57% to 100%
Jul 5 5 100% 57% to 100%
Aug 21 21 100% 85% to 100%
Sep 10 10 100% 72% to 100%
Oct 18 19 95% 75% to 99%
Nov 31 31 100% 89% to 100%
Dec 65 66 98% 92% to 100%

Peak flowering in Jan. Each bar is the share of Salvia carnea observations in which someone actually recorded the reproductive state and found the plant in flower, not the raw number of flowering records. That distinction matters: people observe plants far more in spring than in winter, so a bare count of flowering records partly measures when people go outside. Dividing by the number examined removes that. 270 of 274 examined observations were in flower, every one of them research grade. The whisker on each bar is a 95% Wilson interval. 2 months have fewer than 5 examined observations, so no proportion is drawn for them. This is still a global aggregate and not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres. Where a species has fewer than 30 flowering records we do not draw this chart at all. Computed from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Also published as 15 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Salvia debilis Epling
  • Salvia gracilis Benth.
  • Salvia iodochroa Briq.
  • Salvia irazuensis Fernald
  • Salvia killipiana Epling
  • Salvia martensii Galeotti
  • Salvia membranacea Benth.
  • Salvia membranacea var. villosula Benth.
  • Salvia myriantha Epling
  • Salvia natalis Epling
  • Salvia pseudogracilis Epling
  • Salvia purpurascens M.Martens & Galeotti
  • Salvia sapinea Epling
  • Salvia sidifolia M.Martens & Galeotti
  • Salvia simulans Fernald

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
  3. Kew, World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP v16). native distribution by TDWG level-3 botanical country, and life form. CC BY 3.0. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.