Rumohra berteroana(Colla) Rodriguez

WFO wfo-0001111418 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Rumohra berteroana, photographed by Erasmo Macaya Horta
fig. a Erasmo Macaya Horta, CC BY 4.0 / 2014-02-22 / obs. 5891251
Rumohra berteroana, photographed by Patricio Novoa
fig. b Patricio Novoa, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 193378460
Rumohra berteroana, photographed by Patricio Novoa
fig. c Patricio Novoa, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 193378587
Rumohra berteroana, photographed by Patricio Novoa
fig. d Patricio Novoa, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 191490837
Rumohra berteroana, photographed by Patricio Novoa
fig. e Patricio Novoa, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 191473613
Rumohra berteroana, photographed by Patricio Novoa
fig. f Patricio Novoa, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 191474786
Rumohra berteroana, photographed by Erasmo Macaya Horta
fig. g Erasmo Macaya Horta, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 5891272
Rumohra berteroana, photographed by Patricio Novoa
fig. h Patricio Novoa, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 191474694

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 7 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Aspidium berteroanum Colla
  • Aspidium coriaceum Willd.
  • Aspidium coriaceum E.J.Lowe
  • Aspidium flexum Kunze
  • Dryopteris flexa Kuntze
  • Polystichum berteroanum (Colla) C.Chr.
  • Polystichum flexum Gay

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.