Rubus wallichianusWight & Arn.

WFO wfo-0000996196 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC0 / CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Rubus wallichianus, photographed by Licheng Shih
fig. a Licheng Shih, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-03-20 / obs. 185850446
Rubus wallichianus, photographed by Jacy Chen
fig. b Jacy Chen, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 131609759
Rubus wallichianus, photographed by Jacy Chen
fig. c Jacy Chen, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 127676092
Rubus wallichianus, photographed by 黃美滿
fig. d 黃美滿, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 112987283
Rubus wallichianus, photographed by Jacy Chen
fig. e Jacy Chen, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 63101927
Rubus wallichianus, photographed by agujaceratops
fig. f agujaceratops, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 58247544
Rubus wallichianus, photographed by 葉子
fig. g 葉子, CC0 1.0 / obs. 33341915
Rubus wallichianus, photographed by Cheng-Tao Lin
fig. h Cheng-Tao Lin, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 14723791

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 8 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Rubus duthieanus N.P.Balakr.
  • Rubus ellipticus subsp. fasciculatus Focke
  • Rubus ellipticus subsp. fasciculatus (Duthie) Focke
  • Rubus ellipticus var. fasciculatus (Focke) Masam.
  • Rubus ellipticus var. wallichianus (Wight & Arn.) Focke
  • Rubus erythrolasius Focke
  • Rubus fasciculatus Duthie
  • Rubus pinfaensis H.Lév. & Vaniot

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.