Rubus lindleyanusLees

WFO wfo-0001007867 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC0

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Rubus lindleyanus, photographed by Stephen James McWilliam
fig. a Stephen James McWilliam, CC0 1.0 / 2022-02-25 / obs. 180665719

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 6 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Rubus fruticosus subsp. lindleyanus (Lees) Syme
  • Rubus leucostachys Lindl.
  • Rubus lindleyanus f. cordifolius G.Braun
  • Rubus nitidus Bab.
  • Rubus vulgaris prol. lindleyanus (Lees) Focke
  • Rubus vulgaris subsp. lindleyanus (Lees) Nyman

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.