Rubus geoides | BotanAI

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Rubus geoides, photographed by María Regina Silva — fig. a María Regina Silva, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-05-01 / obs. 194076564

Rubus geoides, photographed by Pablo — fig. c Pablo, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 161941266

Rubus geoides, photographed by aacocucci — fig. e aacocucci, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 110122871

Rubus geoides, photographed by Nicolás Lavandero — fig. f Nicolás Lavandero, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 73254104

Rubus geoides, photographed by Andrew Thornhill — fig. g Andrew Thornhill, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 47694545

Rubus geoides, photographed by Hugo Hulsberg — fig. h Hugo Hulsberg, CC0 1.0 / obs. 190953599

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Native range 4 botanical countries

Native distribution of Rubus geoides, after Kew’s World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Introduced, extinct and doubtful records are excluded, so this is where the plant is from, not everywhere it now grows.

Region	TDWG code	Continent
Argentina South	AGS	SOUTHERN AMERICA
Chile Central	CLC
Chile North	CLN
Falkland Is.	FAL	ANTARCTICA

Region boundaries approximated from Natural Earth (public domain) and mapped to TDWG World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (WGSRPD) level-3 botanical countries (Brummitt 2001). Indicative, not the official WGSRPD geometry.

Flowering 71 in flower of 126 examined

88%

79%

83%

Proportion of examined Rubus geoides in flower, by month
Month	In flower	Examined	Share	95% interval
Jan	29	33	88%	73% to 95%
Feb	0	18	0%	0% to 18%
Mar	0	8	0%	0% to 32%
Apr	0	5	0%	0% to 43%
May	0	1	too few examined
Jun	0	1	too few examined
Jul	0	0	too few examined
Aug	0	0	too few examined
Sep	0	1	too few examined
Oct	0	7	0%	0% to 35%
Nov	22	28	79%	60% to 90%
Dec	20	24	83%	64% to 93%

Peak flowering in Jan. Each bar is the share of Rubus geoides observations in which someone actually recorded the reproductive state and found the plant in flower, not the raw number of flowering records. That distinction matters: people observe plants far more in spring than in winter, so a bare count of flowering records partly measures when people go outside. Dividing by the number examined removes that. 71 of 126 examined observations were in flower, every one of them research grade. The whisker on each bar is a 95% Wilson interval. 5 months have fewer than 5 examined observations, so no proportion is drawn for them. This is still a global aggregate and not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres. Where a species has fewer than 30 flowering records we do not draw this chart at all. Computed from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Also published as 2 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

Dalibarda geoides (Sm.) Pers.
Rubus antarcticus Kuntze

Sourcesevery claim on this page

World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
Kew, World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP v16). native distribution by TDWG level-3 botanical country, and life form. CC BY 3.0. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.