Rosulabryum truncorum(Brid.) Ochyra ex J.R.Spence & Brinda

WFO wfo-1000044778 Accepted WFO 2026-06 5 photographs CC BY / CC BY-SA

Plate 1 figs. a–e · 2 observations

This species has been photographed under an open licence only 2 times, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.

Rosulabryum truncorum, photographed by Arnim Littek
fig. a Arnim Littek, CC BY 4.0 / 2018-01-20 / obs. 13024806
Rosulabryum truncorum, photographed by Colin Meurk
fig. b Colin Meurk, CC BY-SA 4.0 / obs. 12024021
Rosulabryum truncorum, photographed by Arnim Littek
fig. c Arnim Littek, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 13024829
Rosulabryum truncorum, photographed by Colin Meurk
fig. d Colin Meurk, CC BY-SA 4.0 / obs. 12024020
Rosulabryum truncorum, photographed by Arnim Littek
fig. e Arnim Littek, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 13024830

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 8 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Bryum albolimbatum Cardot
  • Bryum imerinanum O'Shea
  • Bryum scariosum Thér.
  • Bryum truncorum (Brid.) Brid.
  • Mnium truncorum Brid.
  • Polla truncorum (Brid.) Brid.
  • Rhodobryum truncorum (Brid.) Paris
  • Rosulabryum truncorum (Brid.) Ochyra

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.