Rosulabryum subtomentosum(Hampe ex A.Jaeger) J.R.Spence

WFO wfo-0001201522 Accepted WFO 2026-06 7 photographs CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–g · 3 observations

This species has been photographed under an open licence only 3 times, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.

Rosulabryum subtomentosum, photographed by Paul Bell-Butler
fig. a Paul Bell-Butler, CC BY 4.0 / 2020-11-18 / obs. 105249480
Rosulabryum subtomentosum, photographed by Bruce Calvert
fig. b Bruce Calvert, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 27418726
Rosulabryum subtomentosum, photographed by Paul Bell-Butler
fig. c Paul Bell-Butler, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 105249489
Rosulabryum subtomentosum, photographed by Bruce Calvert
fig. d Bruce Calvert, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 27418735
Rosulabryum subtomentosum, photographed by Bruce Calvert
fig. e Bruce Calvert, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 27418737
Rosulabryum subtomentosum, photographed by bythepark
fig. f bythepark, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 43685408
Rosulabryum subtomentosum, photographed by bythepark
fig. g bythepark, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 43685432

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 3 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Bryum billarderii var. platyloma Mohamed
  • Bryum subtomentosum Hampe ex A.Jaeger
  • Rhodobryum subtomentosum Hampe

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.