Riccia lamellosaRaddi

WFO wfo-0001198133 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Riccia lamellosa, photographed by Santiago Martín-Bravo
fig. a Santiago Martín-Bravo, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-03-23 / obs. 184181930
Riccia lamellosa, photographed by Rafael Medina
fig. b Rafael Medina, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 182885850
Riccia lamellosa, photographed by Rafael Medina
fig. c Rafael Medina, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 182885247
Riccia lamellosa, photographed by Rafael Medina
fig. d Rafael Medina, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 182885204
Riccia lamellosa, photographed by Ken-ichi Ueda
fig. e Ken-ichi Ueda, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 14049320
Riccia lamellosa, photographed by Ken-ichi Ueda
fig. f Ken-ichi Ueda, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 11078
Riccia lamellosa, photographed by Marc Riera
fig. g Marc Riera, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 170451037
Riccia lamellosa, photographed by Marc Riera
fig. h Marc Riera, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 167542170

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 7 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Riccia americana (M.Howe) M.Howe
  • Riccia austinii Steph.
  • Riccia dufourii Nees
  • Riccia grandisquama Steph.
  • Riccia indusiata S.Winkl.
  • Riccia lamellosa var. americana M.Howe
  • Riccia lamellosa var. lamellosa

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.