Riccia crinitaTaylor

WFO wfo-0001204490 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC0 / CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Riccia crinita, photographed by Randal
fig. a Randal, CC0 1.0 / 2022-05-23 / obs. 200977016
Riccia crinita, photographed by Randal
fig. b Randal, CC0 1.0 / obs. 200978315
Riccia crinita, photographed by Randal
fig. c Randal, CC0 1.0 / obs. 200957337
Riccia crinita, photographed by Braden J. Judson
fig. d Braden J. Judson, CC0 1.0 / obs. 184759706
Riccia crinita, photographed by Trevor Van Loon
fig. e Trevor Van Loon, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 180730029
Riccia crinita, photographed by Trevor Van Loon
fig. f Trevor Van Loon, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 179789241
Riccia crinita, photographed by Randal
fig. g Randal, CC0 1.0 / obs. 157971632
Riccia crinita, photographed by Randal
fig. h Randal, CC0 1.0 / obs. 157971781

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 7 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Riccia areolata Na-Thalang
  • Riccia cana Durieu ex Trab.
  • Riccia canescens Steph.
  • Riccia ciliata subsp. canescens (Steph.) R.M.Schust.
  • Riccia ciliata subsp. trichocarpa (M.Howe) R.M.Schust.
  • Riccia longiciliata Na-Thalang
  • Riccia trichocarpa M.Howe

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.