Rhinanthus majorL.

European yellow rattle

WFO wfo-0001137171 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC0 / CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Rhinanthus major, photographed by Нурхайдарова Татьяна
fig. a Нурхайдарова Татьяна, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-06-11 / obs. 205187766

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Native range 43 botanical countries

Regions where Rhinanthus major is native: Altay, Buryatiya, Chita, Iran, Irkutsk, Kazakhstan, Krasnoyarsk, Mongolia, North Caucasus, Transcaucasus, Türkiye, Tuva, West Siberia, Yakutiya, Albania, Austria, Baltic States, Belarus, Belgium, Bulgaria, Central European Russia, Czechia-Slovakia, Denmark, East European Russia, Finland, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, Italy, Krym, Netherlands, North European Russia, Northwest European Russia, Norway, NW. Balkan Pen., Poland, Romania, South European Russia, Sweden, Switzerland, Türkiye-in-Europe, Ukraine AltayBuryatiyaChitaIranIrkutskKazakhstanKrasnoyarskMongoliaNorth CaucasusTranscaucasusTürkiyeTuvaWest SiberiaYakutiyaAlbaniaAustriaBaltic StatesBelarusBelgiumBulgariaCentral European RussiaCzechia-SlovakiaDenmarkEast European RussiaFinlandFranceGermanyHungaryItalyKrymNetherlandsNorth European RussiaNorthwest European RussiaNorwayNW. Balkan Pen.PolandRomaniaSouth European RussiaSwedenSwitzerlandTürkiye-in-EuropeUkraine
Native distribution of Rhinanthus major, after Kew’s World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Introduced, extinct and doubtful records are excluded, so this is where the plant is from, not everywhere it now grows.
RegionTDWG codeContinent
Albania ALB EUROPE
Austria AUT
Baltic States BLT
Belarus BLR
Belgium BGM
Bulgaria BUL
Central European Russia RUC
Czechia-Slovakia CZE
Denmark DEN
East European Russia RUE
Finland FIN
France FRA
Germany GER
Great Britain GRB
Hungary HUN
Italy ITA
Krym KRY
Netherlands NET
North European Russia RUN
Northwest European Russia RUW
Norway NOR
NW. Balkan Pen. YUG
Poland POL
Romania ROM
South European Russia RUS
Sweden SWE
Switzerland SWI
Türkiye-in-Europe TUE
Ukraine UKR
Altay ALT ASIA-TEMPERATE
Buryatiya BRY
Chita CTA
Iran IRN
Irkutsk IRK
Kazakhstan KAZ
Krasnoyarsk KRA
Mongolia MON
North Caucasus NCS
Transcaucasus TCS
Türkiye TUR
Tuva TVA
West Siberia WSB
Yakutiya YAK

Not drawn on the map: Great Britain. We hold no public-domain boundary for this region, so it is listed rather than guessed at.

Region boundaries approximated from Natural Earth (public domain) and mapped to TDWG World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (WGSRPD) level-3 botanical countries (Brummitt 2001). Indicative, not the official WGSRPD geometry.

Flowering 343 in flower of 363 examined

Proportion of examined Rhinanthus major in flower, by month
Month In flower Examined Share 95% interval
Jan 0 1 too few examined
Feb 0 0 too few examined
Mar 0 0 too few examined
Apr 2 2 too few examined
May 31 32 97% 84% to 99%
Jun 99 104 95% 89% to 98%
Jul 129 135 96% 91% to 98%
Aug 68 73 93% 85% to 97%
Sep 13 13 100% 77% to 100%
Oct 1 3 too few examined
Nov 0 0 too few examined
Dec 0 0 too few examined

Peak flowering in Sep. Each bar is the share of Rhinanthus major observations in which someone actually recorded the reproductive state and found the plant in flower, not the raw number of flowering records. That distinction matters: people observe plants far more in spring than in winter, so a bare count of flowering records partly measures when people go outside. Dividing by the number examined removes that. 343 of 363 examined observations were in flower, every one of them research grade. The whisker on each bar is a 95% Wilson interval. 7 months have fewer than 5 examined observations, so no proportion is drawn for them. This is still a global aggregate and not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres. Where a species has fewer than 30 flowering records we do not draw this chart at all. Computed from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Also published as 89 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Alectorolophus aestivalis N.W.Zinger
  • Alectorolophus alectorolophus Sterneck
  • Alectorolophus angustifolius D.Dietr.
  • Alectorolophus apterus (Fr.) Ostenf.
  • Alectorolophus arenarius Borbás ex Behrend. & Sterneck
  • Alectorolophus aristatus Gremli
  • Alectorolophus bosniacus Behrendsen
  • Alectorolophus grandiflorus Wallr.
  • Alectorolophus heribaudii (Chabert) Dörfl.
  • Alectorolophus major (L.) Rchb.
  • Alectorolophus major var. alpestris Wimm. & Grab.
  • Alectorolophus major var. angustifolius Wimm. & Grab.
  • Alectorolophus major var. bosnensis Behrendsen & Sterneck
  • Alectorolophus montanus (Saut.) Fritsch
  • Alectorolophus serotinus Schönh.
  • Alectorolophus serotinus subsp. vernalis (N.W.Zinger) Hyl.
  • Alectorolophus vernalis N.W.Zinger
  • Fistularia alectorolophus Wettst.
  • Fistularia angustifolia (C.C.Gmel.) Wettst.
  • Fistularia major (L.) Wettst.
  • Fistularia pubescens Wettst.
  • Fistularia serotina (Schönh.) Wettst.
  • Rhinanthus aestivalis (N.W.Zinger) Schischk. & Serg.
  • Rhinanthus alpestris Steud.

and 65 more.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
  3. Wikidata. common name (P1843), joined on the World Flora Online identifier (P7715). CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-13.
  4. Kew, World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP v16). native distribution by TDWG level-3 botanical country, and life form. CC BY 3.0. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.