Plate 1 figs. a–c · 3 separate observations
Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.
Also published as 21 synonyms
A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.
- Andinopuntia lagopus (K.Schum.) Guiggi
- Andinopuntia lagopus subsp. septentrionalis Guiggi
- Austrocylindropuntia lagopus (K.Schum.) I.Crook, J.Arnold & M.Lowry
- Austrocylindropuntia lagopus (K.Schum.) F.Ritter
- Austrocylindropuntia lagopus subsp. malyanus (Rausch) Ostolaza
- Austrocylindropuntia malyana (Rausch) F.Ritter
- Opuntia lagopus K.Schum.
- Opuntia lagopus subvar. brachycarpa (Rauh & Backeb.) G.D.Rowley
- Opuntia lagopus var. aurea (Rauh & Backeb.) G.D.Rowley
- Opuntia lagopus var. aureo-penicillata (Rauh & Backeb.) G.D.Rowley
- Opuntia lagopus var. leucolagopus (Rauh & Backeb.) G.D.Rowley
- Opuntia lagopus var. pachyclada (Rauh & Backeb.) G.D.Rowley
- Tephrocactus floccosus var. lagopus (K.Schum.) F.Ritter
- Tephrocactus floccosus var. lapopus (K.Schum.) F.Ritter
- Tephrocactus lagopus (K.Schum.) Backeb.
- Tephrocactus lagopus subvar. brachycarpus Rauh & Backeb.
- Tephrocactus lagopus var. aureo-penicillatus Rauh & Backeb.
- Tephrocactus lagopus var. aureus Rauh & Backeb.
- Tephrocactus lagopus var. leucolagopus Rauh & Backeb.
- Tephrocactus lagopus var. pachycladus Rauh & Backeb.
- Tephrocactus malyanus Rausch
Sourcesevery claim on this page
- World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
- iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.