Plate 1 figs. a–g · 2 observations
This species has been photographed under an open licence only 2 times, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.
Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.
Also published as 10 synonyms
A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.
- Bryum lutescens (Limpr.) Kindb.
- Leptobryum lutescens (Limpr.) Mönk.
- Mniobryum lutescens (Limpr.) Loeske
- Mniobryum lutescens var. hamatum (H.Schmidt) Podp.
- Pohlia lutescens var. flagellaris Spindl.
- Webera hamata H.Schmidt
- Webera ludwigii var. lutescens (Limpr.) Paris
- Webera lutescens Limpr.
- Webera lutescens f. flagellaris (Spindl.) Riehm.
- Webera pulchella subsp. lutescens (Limpr.) J.J.Amann
Sourcesevery claim on this page
- World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
- iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.