Pohlia lutescens(Limpr.) H.Lindb.

WFO wfo-0001160222 Accepted WFO 2026-06 7 photographs CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–g · 2 observations

This species has been photographed under an open licence only 2 times, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.

Pohlia lutescens, photographed by Christian Berg
fig. a Christian Berg, CC BY 4.0 / 2018-12-31 / obs. 65719957

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 10 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Bryum lutescens (Limpr.) Kindb.
  • Leptobryum lutescens (Limpr.) Mönk.
  • Mniobryum lutescens (Limpr.) Loeske
  • Mniobryum lutescens var. hamatum (H.Schmidt) Podp.
  • Pohlia lutescens var. flagellaris Spindl.
  • Webera hamata H.Schmidt
  • Webera ludwigii var. lutescens (Limpr.) Paris
  • Webera lutescens Limpr.
  • Webera lutescens f. flagellaris (Spindl.) Riehm.
  • Webera pulchella subsp. lutescens (Limpr.) J.J.Amann

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.