Odontonema cuspidatum(Nees) Kuntze

mottled toothedthread

WFO wfo-0000385253 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC0 / CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Odontonema cuspidatum, photographed by Kevin Faccenda
fig. a Kevin Faccenda, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-01-22 / obs. 176855885

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Native range 7 botanical countries

Regions where Odontonema cuspidatum is native: Mexico Central, Mexico Gulf, Mexico Southeast, Mexico Southwest, Guatemala, Honduras, Panamá Mexico CentralMexico GulfMexico SoutheastMexico SouthwestGuatemalaHondurasPanamá
Native distribution of Odontonema cuspidatum, after Kew’s World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Introduced, extinct and doubtful records are excluded, so this is where the plant is from, not everywhere it now grows.
RegionTDWG codeContinent
Mexico Central MXC NORTHERN AMERICA
Mexico Gulf MXG
Mexico Southeast MXT
Mexico Southwest MXS
Guatemala GUA SOUTHERN AMERICA
Honduras HON
Panamá PAN

Region boundaries approximated from Natural Earth (public domain) and mapped to TDWG World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (WGSRPD) level-3 botanical countries (Brummitt 2001). Indicative, not the official WGSRPD geometry.

Flowering 61 in flower of 68 examined

Proportion of examined Odontonema cuspidatum in flower, by month
Month In flower Examined Share 95% interval
Jan 11 12 92% 65% to 99%
Feb 5 7 71% 36% to 92%
Mar 4 6 67% 30% to 90%
Apr 4 4 too few examined
May 2 2 too few examined
Jun 1 1 too few examined
Jul 9 9 100% 70% to 100%
Aug 7 8 88% 53% to 98%
Sep 0 1 too few examined
Oct 4 4 too few examined
Nov 5 5 100% 57% to 100%
Dec 9 9 100% 70% to 100%

Peak flowering in Jul. Each bar is the share of Odontonema cuspidatum observations in which someone actually recorded the reproductive state and found the plant in flower, not the raw number of flowering records. That distinction matters: people observe plants far more in spring than in winter, so a bare count of flowering records partly measures when people go outside. Dividing by the number examined removes that. 61 of 68 examined observations were in flower, every one of them research grade. The whisker on each bar is a 95% Wilson interval. 5 months have fewer than 5 examined observations, so no proportion is drawn for them. This is still a global aggregate and not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres. Where a species has fewer than 30 flowering records we do not draw this chart at all. Computed from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Also published as 6 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Aphelandra longiscapa Lem.
  • Eranthemum coccineum Lem.
  • Justicia longiracemosa Lem.
  • Thyrsacanthus cuspidatus Nees
  • Thyrsacanthus lemaireanus Nees
  • Thyrsacanthus lemairianus Nees

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
  3. Wikidata. common name (P1843), joined on the World Flora Online identifier (P7715). CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-13.
  4. Kew, World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP v16). native distribution by TDWG level-3 botanical country, and life form. CC BY 3.0. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.