Murraya paniculataKaneh.

WFO wfo-0001253685 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC BY / CC BY-SA

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Murraya paniculata, photographed by Greg Tasney
fig. a Greg Tasney, CC BY-SA 4.0 / 2022-06-13 / obs. 205711071

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Flowering 117 in flower of 243 examined

Proportion of examined Murraya paniculata in flower, by month
Month In flower Examined Share 95% interval
Jan 7 21 33% 17% to 55%
Feb 5 10 50% 24% to 76%
Mar 12 33 36% 22% to 53%
Apr 15 30 50% 33% to 67%
May 7 18 39% 20% to 61%
Jun 13 19 68% 46% to 85%
Jul 9 14 64% 39% to 84%
Aug 7 16 44% 23% to 67%
Sep 14 20 70% 48% to 85%
Oct 13 23 57% 37% to 74%
Nov 6 20 30% 15% to 52%
Dec 9 19 47% 27% to 68%

Peak flowering in Sep. Each bar is the share of Murraya paniculata observations in which someone actually recorded the reproductive state and found the plant in flower, not the raw number of flowering records. That distinction matters: people observe plants far more in spring than in winter, so a bare count of flowering records partly measures when people go outside. Dividing by the number examined removes that. 117 of 243 examined observations were in flower, every one of them research grade. The whisker on each bar is a 95% Wilson interval. This is still a global aggregate and not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres. Where a species has fewer than 30 flowering records we do not draw this chart at all. Computed from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.