Mitchella repensL.

partridgeberry

WFO wfo-0000244794 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC0 / CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–h

Mitchella repens, photographed by Jessica Turcotte
fig. a Jessica Turcotte, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-06-12 / obs. 205536350

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Confused withby our own model

These are not lookalikes we guessed at. Each one is a species our identification model genuinely mistook for this plant, and how many times. The error rate is published.

Flowering n = 11,106 observations

Flowering observations of Mitchella repens by month
MonthObservations
Jan29
Feb35
Mar297
Apr1471
May3200
Jun4433
Jul1477
Aug29
Sep35
Oct54
Nov20
Dec26

Peak flowering in Jun, from 11,106 community-annotated observations worldwide. This is a global aggregate, not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres, and citizen-science records cluster near cities, at weekends, and in spring. Where a species has fewer than 30 annotated records we do not draw this chart at all.

Also published as 6 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Disperma repens J.F.Gmel.
  • Mitchella repens f. leucocarpa Bissell
  • Mitchella repens f. repens
  • Mitchella repens var. alba Beal
  • Perdicesca repens (L.) Prov.
  • Perdicesea repens (L.) Prov.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice, no toxicity claim and no native range, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.