Microeurhynchium pumilum(Wilson) Ignatov & Vanderp.

WFO wfo-0001214664 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 2 observations

This species has been photographed under an open licence only 2 times, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.

Microeurhynchium pumilum, photographed by George Greiff
fig. a George Greiff, CC BY 4.0 / 2020-03-18 / obs. 63861086

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 16 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Amblystegium burnatii J.J.Amann
  • Apterygium pumilum (Wilson) Kindb.
  • Eurhynchium pallidirostrum (Brid.) Limpr.
  • Eurhynchium praelongum var. pumilum (Wilson) Schimp.
  • Eurhynchium pumilum (Wilson) Schimp.
  • Hypnum pallidirostrum (Brid.) Müll.Hal.
  • Hypnum praelongum var. pallidirostrum Brid.
  • Hypnum pumilum Wilson
  • Hypnum swartzii var. minus Turner
  • Oxyrrhynchium pallidirostrum (Brid.) Wijk & Margad.
  • Oxyrrhynchium pumilum (Wilson) Loeske
  • Pancovia pumila (Wilson) Piré
  • Pilaisaea radicans Bach.Pyl.
  • Rhynchostegiella pallidirostra (Brid.) Loeske
  • Rhynchostegiella pumila (Wilson) E.F.Warb.
  • Rhynchostegium pumilum (Wilson) De Not.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.