Plate 1 figs. a–f · 2 observations
This species has been photographed under an open licence only 2 times, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.
Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.
Also published as 10 synonyms
A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.
- Chiloscyphus canariensis Bryhn
- Chiloscyphus fragrans (Moris & De Not.) J.J.Engel & R.M.Schust.
- Chiloscyphus hirticalyx (Steph.) J.J.Engel & R.M.Schust.
- Jungermannia fragrans Moris & De Not.
- Lophocolea fragrans f. fragrans
- Lophocolea fragrans var. capensis S.W.Arnell
- Lophocolea fragrans var. fragrans
- Lophocolea frappieri Steph.
- Lophocolea hirticalyx Steph.
- Lophocolea spicata Taylor ex Gottsche, Lindenb. & Nees
Sourcesevery claim on this page
- World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
- iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.