Lophocolea bispinosa(Hook.f. & Taylor) Gottsche, Lindenb. & Nees

WFO wfo-0001207455 Accepted WFO 2026-06 5 photographs CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–e · 1 observation

This species has been photographed under an open licence only 1 time, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.

Lophocolea bispinosa, photographed by Young Jun Lee
fig. a Young Jun Lee, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-03-30 / obs. 185369514
Lophocolea bispinosa, photographed by Young Jun Lee
fig. b Young Jun Lee, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 185369470
Lophocolea bispinosa, photographed by Young Jun Lee
fig. c Young Jun Lee, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 185369479
Lophocolea bispinosa, photographed by Young Jun Lee
fig. d Young Jun Lee, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 185369503
Lophocolea bispinosa, photographed by Young Jun Lee
fig. e Young Jun Lee, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 185369531

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 5 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Chiloscyphus bispinosus (Hook.f. & Taylor) J.J.Engel & R.M.Schust.
  • Jungermannia bispinosa Hook.f. & Taylor
  • Lophocolea curvifolia Herzog
  • Lophocolea minuta Pearson
  • Lophocolea mittenii Steph.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.