Lomandra filiformis(Thunb.) Britten

WFO wfo-0000753765 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC BY-SA

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Lomandra filiformis, photographed by Greg Tasney
fig. a Greg Tasney, CC BY-SA 4.0 / 2022-06-09 / obs. 204580496

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Native range 3 botanical countries

Regions where Lomandra filiformis is native: New South Wales, Queensland, Victoria New South WalesQueenslandVictoria
Native distribution of Lomandra filiformis, after Kew’s World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Introduced, extinct and doubtful records are excluded, so this is where the plant is from, not everywhere it now grows.
RegionTDWG codeContinent
New South Wales NSW AUSTRALASIA
Queensland QLD
Victoria VIC

Region boundaries approximated from Natural Earth (public domain) and mapped to TDWG World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (WGSRPD) level-3 botanical countries (Brummitt 2001). Indicative, not the official WGSRPD geometry.

Flowering 227 in flower of 280 examined

Proportion of examined Lomandra filiformis in flower, by month
Month In flower Examined Share 95% interval
Jan 7 8 88% 53% to 98%
Feb 5 5 100% 57% to 100%
Mar 4 4 too few examined
Apr 8 12 67% 39% to 86%
May 5 10 50% 24% to 76%
Jun 3 5 60% 23% to 88%
Jul 7 9 78% 45% to 94%
Aug 17 19 89% 69% to 97%
Sep 43 48 90% 78% to 95%
Oct 54 71 76% 65% to 84%
Nov 52 64 81% 70% to 89%
Dec 22 25 88% 70% to 96%

Peak flowering in Feb. Each bar is the share of Lomandra filiformis observations in which someone actually recorded the reproductive state and found the plant in flower, not the raw number of flowering records. That distinction matters: people observe plants far more in spring than in winter, so a bare count of flowering records partly measures when people go outside. Dividing by the number examined removes that. 227 of 280 examined observations were in flower, every one of them research grade. The whisker on each bar is a 95% Wilson interval. One month has fewer than 5 examined observations, so no proportion is drawn for it. This is still a global aggregate and not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres. Where a species has fewer than 30 flowering records we do not draw this chart at all. Computed from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Also published as 5 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Dracaena filiformis Thunb.
  • Xerotes denticulata R.Br.
  • Xerotes filiformis (Thunb.) R.Br.
  • Xerotes tenuifolia R.Br.
  • Xerotes thunbergii F.Muell.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
  3. Kew, World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP v16). native distribution by TDWG level-3 botanical country, and life form. CC BY 3.0. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.