Linanthus dichotomus (eveningsnow)

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Linanthus dichotomus, photographed by Steve Woodward — fig. a Steve Woodward, CC0 1.0 / 2022-05-05 / obs. 196643417

Linanthus dichotomus, photographed by Kristen Nelson — fig. b Kristen Nelson, CC0 1.0 / obs. 185461050

Linanthus dichotomus, photographed by Don Loarie — fig. c Don Loarie, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 123698652

Linanthus dichotomus, photographed by Jeremiah Degenhardt — fig. d Jeremiah Degenhardt, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 41971011

Linanthus dichotomus, photographed by Leah Gardner — fig. f Leah Gardner, CC0 1.0 / obs. 60953704

Linanthus dichotomus, photographed by Ken-ichi Ueda — fig. g Ken-ichi Ueda, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 7451752

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Native range 5 botanical countries

Native distribution of Linanthus dichotomus, after Kew’s World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Introduced, extinct and doubtful records are excluded, so this is where the plant is from, not everywhere it now grows.

Region	TDWG code	Continent
Arizona	ARI	NORTHERN AMERICA
California	CAL
Mexico Northwest	MXN
Nevada	NEV
Utah	UTA

Region boundaries approximated from Natural Earth (public domain) and mapped to TDWG World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (WGSRPD) level-3 botanical countries (Brummitt 2001). Indicative, not the official WGSRPD geometry.

Flowering 104 in flower of 109 examined

100%

93%

91%

Proportion of examined Linanthus dichotomus in flower, by month
Month	In flower	Examined	Share	95% interval
Jan	2	2	too few examined
Feb	6	6	100%	61% to 100%
Mar	28	28	100%	88% to 100%
Apr	57	61	93%	84% to 97%
May	10	11	91%	62% to 98%
Jun	1	1	too few examined
Jul	0	0	too few examined
Aug	0	0	too few examined
Sep	0	0	too few examined
Oct	0	0	too few examined
Nov	0	0	too few examined
Dec	0	0	too few examined

Peak flowering in Feb. Each bar is the share of Linanthus dichotomus observations in which someone actually recorded the reproductive state and found the plant in flower, not the raw number of flowering records. That distinction matters: people observe plants far more in spring than in winter, so a bare count of flowering records partly measures when people go outside. Dividing by the number examined removes that. 104 of 109 examined observations were in flower, every one of them research grade. The whisker on each bar is a 95% Wilson interval. 8 months have fewer than 5 examined observations, so no proportion is drawn for them. This is still a global aggregate and not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres. Where a species has fewer than 30 flowering records we do not draw this chart at all. Computed from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Also published as 8 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

Gilia dichotoma Benth.
Gilia dichotoma var. integra M.E.Jones
Gilia dichotoma var. uniflora Brand
Gilia linanthus Steud.
Linanthus dichotomus subsp. meridianus (Eastw.) H.Mason
Linanthus dichotomus var. dichotomus
Linanthus dichotomus var. meridianus Eastw.
Navarretia dichotoma Kuntze

Sourcesevery claim on this page

World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
Wikidata. common name (P1843), joined on the World Flora Online identifier (P7715). CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-13.
Kew, World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP v16). native distribution by TDWG level-3 botanical country, and life form. CC BY 3.0. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.