Lejeunea lamacerina(Steph.) Schiffn.

WFO wfo-0001196426 Accepted WFO 2026-06 4 photographs CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–d · 1 observation

This species has been photographed under an open licence only 1 time, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.

Lejeunea lamacerina, photographed by Young Jun Lee
fig. a Young Jun Lee, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-03-28 / obs. 185080863

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 14 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Eulejeunea azorica Steph.
  • Eulejeunea lamacerina Steph.
  • Lejeunea azorica (Steph.) Steph.
  • Lejeunea cavifolia f. heterophylla (Carrington) Jørg.
  • Lejeunea cavifolia var. heterophylla (Carrington) Macvicar
  • Lejeunea cavifolia var. planiuscula (Lindb.) Lindb.
  • Lejeunea flava var. italica (C.Massal. & Carestia) C.Massal.
  • Lejeunea lamacerina var. azorica (Steph.) Greig-Sm.
  • Lejeunea lamacerina var. lamacerina
  • Lejeunea moorei var. italica C.Massal. & Carestia
  • Lejeunea planiuscula (Lindb.) H.Buch
  • Lejeunea serpillifolia f. planiuscula Lindb.
  • Lejeunea serpillifolia var. heterophylla Carrington
  • Lejeunea serpillifolia var. planiuscula (Lindb.) C.Massal.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.