Lathyrus gorgoniParl.

WFO wfo-0000186108 Accepted WFO 2026-06 7 photographs CC BY / CC BY-SA

Plate 1 figs. a–g · 4 observations

This species has been photographed under an open licence only 4 times, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.

Lathyrus gorgoni, photographed by Eleftherios Katsillis
fig. a Eleftherios Katsillis, CC BY 4.0 / 2021-02-24 / obs. 113987758

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 14 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Cicercula cicera var. amoena (Fenzl) Alef.
  • Lathyrus allardii Batt.
  • Lathyrus amoenus Fenzl
  • Lathyrus cicera var. lineatus Post
  • Lathyrus cicera var. negevensis Plitmann
  • Lathyrus gorgonei subsp. alatus Gabay & Plitmann
  • Lathyrus gorgonei subsp. lineatus (Post) Ponert
  • Lathyrus gorgonei subsp. tiriopolitanus (Davidov) Ponert
  • Lathyrus gorgoni var. lineatus (Post) C.C.Towns.
  • Lathyrus gorgoni var. pilosus C.C.Towns.
  • Lathyrus gorgonii var. lineatus (Post) Towns.
  • Lathyrus lineatus (Post) Zohary
  • Lathyrus pseudocicera subsp. negevensis (Plitmann) Plitmann & Heyn ex Greuter
  • Lathyrus tiriopolitanus Davidov

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.