Lagenophora pumila(G.Forst.) Cheeseman

WFO wfo-0000069013 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Lagenophora pumila, photographed by Leon Perrie
fig. a Leon Perrie, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-06-10 / obs. 205989596

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Native range 5 botanical countries

Regions where Lagenophora pumila is native: Antipodean Is., Chatham Is., Kermadec Is., New Zealand North, New Zealand South New Zealand NorthNew Zealand South Antipodean Is.Chatham Is.Kermadec Is.
Native distribution of Lagenophora pumila, after Kew’s World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Introduced, extinct and doubtful records are excluded, so this is where the plant is from, not everywhere it now grows. Regions too small to draw at this scale are marked with a dot.
RegionTDWG codeContinent
Antipodean Is. ATP AUSTRALASIA
Chatham Is. CTM
Kermadec Is. KER
New Zealand North NZN
New Zealand South NZS

Region boundaries approximated from Natural Earth (public domain) and mapped to TDWG World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (WGSRPD) level-3 botanical countries (Brummitt 2001). Indicative, not the official WGSRPD geometry.

Flowering 354 in flower of 358 examined

Proportion of examined Lagenophora pumila in flower, by month
Month In flower Examined Share 95% interval
Jan 94 94 100% 96% to 100%
Feb 59 59 100% 94% to 100%
Mar 35 35 100% 90% to 100%
Apr 17 17 100% 82% to 100%
May 10 10 100% 72% to 100%
Jun 4 4 too few examined
Jul 1 2 too few examined
Aug 0 0 too few examined
Sep 0 0 too few examined
Oct 8 9 89% 56% to 98%
Nov 38 39 97% 87% to 100%
Dec 88 89 99% 94% to 100%

Peak flowering in Jan. Each bar is the share of Lagenophora pumila observations in which someone actually recorded the reproductive state and found the plant in flower, not the raw number of flowering records. That distinction matters: people observe plants far more in spring than in winter, so a bare count of flowering records partly measures when people go outside. Dividing by the number examined removes that. 354 of 358 examined observations were in flower, every one of them research grade. The whisker on each bar is a 95% Wilson interval. 4 months have fewer than 5 examined observations, so no proportion is drawn for them. This is still a global aggregate and not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres. Where a species has fewer than 30 flowering records we do not draw this chart at all. Computed from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Where it actually grows measured, from 831 observations

Condition 5th percentile Median 95th percentile
Coldest month, mean daily low -1.3 °C 3.8 °C 9.4 °C
Warmest month, mean daily high 16.0 °C 18.3 °C 21.4 °C
Annual rainfall 979 mm 1,600 mm 3,369 mm
Rainfall in the driest quarter 204 mm 326 mm 665 mm

It is found where winters bring light frost. This is not care advice and it is not a forecast. It is a measurement: we sampled the climate at every one of the 831 research-grade observations of Lagenophora pumila that carry a coordinate, and this is the range those places actually span. The 5th and 95th percentiles are used rather than the minimum and maximum, because a single cultivated specimen in a heated conservatory should not widen a tropical plant's range to the Arctic.

This is not a hardiness zone. A USDA zone is the average annual extreme minimum temperature. The figure above is the mean daily minimum of the coldest month, which is a different quantity and is typically far warmer. Reading one as the other would place a plant several zones too warm, so we do not publish a hardiness zone, because we do not have one. Climate from CHELSA V2.1 (Karger et al. 2017); occurrences from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Also published as 6 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Bellis geifolia Banks & Sol. ex Hook.
  • Calendula pumila G.Forst.
  • Lagenophora forsteri DC.
  • Lagenophora forsteri var. forsteri
  • Lagenophora pumila var. pumila
  • Microcalia australis A.Rich.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
  3. Kew, World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP v16). native distribution by TDWG level-3 botanical country, and life form. CC BY 3.0. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.