Hymenopappus filifoliusHook.

fineleaf hymenopappus

WFO wfo-0000001098 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC0 / CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Hymenopappus filifolius, photographed by Robbie Hannawacker
fig. a Robbie Hannawacker, CC0 1.0 / 2022-05-19 / obs. 198922785

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Native range 19 botanical countries

Regions where Hymenopappus filifolius is native: Alberta, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Kansas, Mexico Northwest, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, Saskatchewan, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Washington, Wyoming AlbertaArizonaCaliforniaColoradoIdahoKansasMexico NorthwestMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew MexicoNorth DakotaOregonSaskatchewanSouth DakotaTexasUtahWashingtonWyoming
Native distribution of Hymenopappus filifolius, after Kew’s World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Introduced, extinct and doubtful records are excluded, so this is where the plant is from, not everywhere it now grows.
RegionTDWG codeContinent
Alberta ABT NORTHERN AMERICA
Arizona ARI
California CAL
Colorado COL
Idaho IDA
Kansas KAN
Mexico Northwest MXN
Montana MNT
Nebraska NEB
Nevada NEV
New Mexico NWM
North Dakota NDA
Oregon ORE
Saskatchewan SAS
South Dakota SDA
Texas TEX
Utah UTA
Washington WAS
Wyoming WYO

Region boundaries approximated from Natural Earth (public domain) and mapped to TDWG World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (WGSRPD) level-3 botanical countries (Brummitt 2001). Indicative, not the official WGSRPD geometry.

Flowering 116 in flower of 134 examined

Proportion of examined Hymenopappus filifolius in flower, by month
Month In flower Examined Share 95% interval
Jan 0 0 too few examined
Feb 0 0 too few examined
Mar 1 7 14% 3% to 51%
Apr 2 5 40% 12% to 77%
May 44 49 90% 78% to 96%
Jun 46 47 98% 89% to 100%
Jul 13 15 87% 62% to 96%
Aug 3 3 too few examined
Sep 7 7 100% 65% to 100%
Oct 0 0 too few examined
Nov 0 1 too few examined
Dec 0 0 too few examined

Peak flowering in Sep. Each bar is the share of Hymenopappus filifolius observations in which someone actually recorded the reproductive state and found the plant in flower, not the raw number of flowering records. That distinction matters: people observe plants far more in spring than in winter, so a bare count of flowering records partly measures when people go outside. Dividing by the number examined removes that. 116 of 134 examined observations were in flower, every one of them research grade. The whisker on each bar is a 95% Wilson interval. 6 months have fewer than 5 examined observations, so no proportion is drawn for them. This is still a global aggregate and not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres. Where a species has fewer than 30 flowering records we do not draw this chart at all. Computed from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Where it actually grows measured, from 943 observations

Condition 5th percentile Median 95th percentile
Coldest month, mean daily low -12.7 °C -6.7 °C -0.8 °C
Warmest month, mean daily high 24.6 °C 29.2 °C 33.8 °C
Annual rainfall 185 mm 385 mm 582 mm
Rainfall in the driest quarter 19 mm 49 mm 74 mm

It is found where winters bring hard frost. This is not care advice and it is not a forecast. It is a measurement: we sampled the climate at every one of the 943 research-grade observations of Hymenopappus filifolius that carry a coordinate, and this is the range those places actually span. The 5th and 95th percentiles are used rather than the minimum and maximum, because a single cultivated specimen in a heated conservatory should not widen a tropical plant's range to the Arctic.

This is not a hardiness zone. A USDA zone is the average annual extreme minimum temperature. The figure above is the mean daily minimum of the coldest month, which is a different quantity and is typically far warmer. Reading one as the other would place a plant several zones too warm, so we do not publish a hardiness zone, because we do not have one. Climate from CHELSA V2.1 (Karger et al. 2017); occurrences from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Also published as 15 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Hymenopappus arenosus A.Heller
  • Hymenopappus cinereus Rydb.
  • Hymenopappus eriopoda A.Nelson
  • Hymenopappus eriopodus A.Nelson
  • Hymenopappus filifolius var. alpestris (Maguire) Shinners
  • Hymenopappus gloriosus A.Heller
  • Hymenopappus lugens Greene
  • Hymenopappus luteus Nutt.
  • Hymenopappus nanus Rydb.
  • Hymenopappus nudipes Maguire
  • Hymenopappus nudipes var. nudipes
  • Hymenopappus parvulus Greene
  • Hymenopappus pauciflorus I.M.Johnst.
  • Hymenopappus polycephalus Osterh.
  • Hymenopappus tomentosus Rydb.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
  3. Wikidata. common name (P1843), joined on the World Flora Online identifier (P7715). CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-13.
  4. Kew, World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP v16). native distribution by TDWG level-3 botanical country, and life form. CC BY 3.0. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.