Hoffmannseggia microphyllaTorr.

wand holdback

WFO wfo-0000166915 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC0 / CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Hoffmannseggia microphylla, photographed by Diana
fig. a Diana, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-06-02 / obs. 202822274

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

The specimen a real sheet, in a real collection

Herbarium
The New York Botanical Garden
Accession
3759841
Filed as
Hoffmannseggia microphylla Torr.
Det. by
B. B. Simpson 1998-01-01
Collected
N. H. Holmgren 1973-03-24
Origin
US
The sheet
View the digitised specimen (CC BY 4.0)

A real pressed plant, in a real collection, under the accession number above. Not an illustration of one. The holding institution does not serve this sheet’s image to third parties, so there is no photograph here. The record is real and the link goes to it. Where we hold no openly licensed sheet for a species this section is simply absent, and where a sheet never recorded who determined it, that field stays empty rather than being filled in. Roughly half of all herbarium sheets never recorded a determiner, which is ordinary.

Native range 3 botanical countries

Regions where Hoffmannseggia microphylla is native: Arizona, California, Mexico Northwest ArizonaCaliforniaMexico Northwest
Native distribution of Hoffmannseggia microphylla, after Kew’s World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Introduced, extinct and doubtful records are excluded, so this is where the plant is from, not everywhere it now grows.
RegionTDWG codeContinent
Arizona ARI NORTHERN AMERICA
California CAL
Mexico Northwest MXN

Region boundaries approximated from Natural Earth (public domain) and mapped to TDWG World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (WGSRPD) level-3 botanical countries (Brummitt 2001). Indicative, not the official WGSRPD geometry.

Flowering 464 in flower of 597 examined

Proportion of examined Hoffmannseggia microphylla in flower, by month
Month In flower Examined Share 95% interval
Jan 67 126 53% 45% to 62%
Feb 109 131 83% 76% to 89%
Mar 129 145 89% 83% to 93%
Apr 46 47 98% 89% to 100%
May 20 21 95% 77% to 99%
Jun 7 7 100% 65% to 100%
Jul 2 2 too few examined
Aug 1 1 too few examined
Sep 7 8 88% 53% to 98%
Oct 14 15 93% 70% to 99%
Nov 29 37 78% 63% to 89%
Dec 33 57 58% 45% to 70%

Peak flowering in Jun. Each bar is the share of Hoffmannseggia microphylla observations in which someone actually recorded the reproductive state and found the plant in flower, not the raw number of flowering records. That distinction matters: people observe plants far more in spring than in winter, so a bare count of flowering records partly measures when people go outside. Dividing by the number examined removes that. 464 of 597 examined observations were in flower, every one of them research grade. The whisker on each bar is a 95% Wilson interval. 2 months have fewer than 5 examined observations, so no proportion is drawn for them. This is still a global aggregate and not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres. Where a species has fewer than 30 flowering records we do not draw this chart at all. Computed from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Where it actually grows measured, from 1,408 observations

Condition 5th percentile Median 95th percentile
Coldest month, mean daily low 6.6 °C 8.2 °C 9.5 °C
Warmest month, mean daily high 37.4 °C 40.8 °C 41.9 °C
Annual rainfall 85 mm 119 mm 181 mm
Rainfall in the driest quarter 3 mm 6 mm 10 mm

It is barely found anywhere that freezes. This is not care advice and it is not a forecast. It is a measurement: we sampled the climate at every one of the 1,408 research-grade observations of Hoffmannseggia microphylla that carry a coordinate, and this is the range those places actually span. The 5th and 95th percentiles are used rather than the minimum and maximum, because a single cultivated specimen in a heated conservatory should not widen a tropical plant's range to the Arctic.

This is not a hardiness zone. A USDA zone is the average annual extreme minimum temperature. The figure above is the mean daily minimum of the coldest month, which is a different quantity and is typically far warmer. Reading one as the other would place a plant several zones too warm, so we do not publish a hardiness zone, because we do not have one. Climate from CHELSA V2.1 (Karger et al. 2017); occurrences from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Also published as 3 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Caesalpinia virgata Fisher
  • Larrea microphylla (Torr.) Britton & Rose
  • Larrea microphylla (Torr.) Britton

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
  3. Wikidata. common name (P1843), joined on the World Flora Online identifier (P7715). CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-13.
  4. Kew, World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP v16). native distribution by TDWG level-3 botanical country, and life form. CC BY 3.0. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.