Heteroscyphus allodontus(Hook.f. & Taylor) J.J.Engel & R.M.Schust.

WFO wfo-0001203281 Accepted WFO 2026-06 4 photographs CC0

Plate 1 figs. a–d · 1 observation

This species has been photographed under an open licence only 1 time, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.

Heteroscyphus allodontus, photographed by Peter de Lange
fig. a Peter de Lange, CC0 1.0 / 2016-11-06 / obs. 5466938

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 11 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Chiloscyphus allodontus (Hook.f. & Taylor) E.A.Hodgs.
  • Chiloscyphus biciliatus (Hook.f. & Taylor) Hook.f. & Taylor ex Gottsche, Lindenb. & Nees
  • Chiloscyphus cambewarranus Steph.
  • Chiloscyphus floribundus Steph.
  • Chiloscyphus piperitus Mitt.
  • Heteroscyphus biciliatus (Hook.f. & Taylor) J.J.Engel
  • Heteroscyphus cambewarranus (Steph.) J.J.Engel & R.M.Schust.
  • Jungermannia allodonta Hook.f. & Taylor
  • Jungermannia biciliata Hook.f. & Taylor
  • Lophocolea allodonta (Hook.f. & Taylor) Gottsche, Lindenb. & Nees
  • Lophocolea biciliata (Hook.f. & Taylor) Mitt.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.