Helleborus viridisL.

Christmas-roseGreen HelleboreLenten-rosegreen hellebore

WFO wfo-0000719221 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC BY / CC BY-SA

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Helleborus viridis, photographed by Thomas Koffel
fig. a Thomas Koffel, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-05-25 / obs. 200828769

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Native range 8 botanical countries

Regions where Helleborus viridis is native: Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, Spain, Switzerland AustriaBelgiumFranceGermanyItalySpainSwitzerland
Native distribution of Helleborus viridis, after Kew’s World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Introduced, extinct and doubtful records are excluded, so this is where the plant is from, not everywhere it now grows.
RegionTDWG codeContinent
Austria AUT EUROPE
Belgium BGM
France FRA
Germany GER
Great Britain GRB
Italy ITA
Spain SPA
Switzerland SWI

Not drawn on the map: Great Britain. We hold no public-domain boundary for this region, so it is listed rather than guessed at.

Region boundaries approximated from Natural Earth (public domain) and mapped to TDWG World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (WGSRPD) level-3 botanical countries (Brummitt 2001). Indicative, not the official WGSRPD geometry.

Flowering 425 in flower of 748 examined

Proportion of examined Helleborus viridis in flower, by month
Month In flower Examined Share 95% interval
Jan 52 67 78% 66% to 86%
Feb 157 170 92% 87% to 95%
Mar 137 179 77% 70% to 82%
Apr 46 124 37% 29% to 46%
May 22 83 27% 18% to 37%
Jun 5 55 9% 4% to 20%
Jul 2 30 7% 2% to 21%
Aug 1 10 10% 2% to 40%
Sep 0 10 0% 0% to 28%
Oct 0 8 0% 0% to 32%
Nov 0 2 too few examined
Dec 3 10 30% 11% to 60%

Peak flowering in Feb. Each bar is the share of Helleborus viridis observations in which someone actually recorded the reproductive state and found the plant in flower, not the raw number of flowering records. That distinction matters: people observe plants far more in spring than in winter, so a bare count of flowering records partly measures when people go outside. Dividing by the number examined removes that. 425 of 748 examined observations were in flower, every one of them research grade. The whisker on each bar is a 95% Wilson interval. One month has fewer than 5 examined observations, so no proportion is drawn for it. This is still a global aggregate and not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres. Where a species has fewer than 30 flowering records we do not draw this chart at all. Computed from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Also published as 10 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Helleboraster viridis Moench
  • Helleborus abruzzicus M.Thomsen, McLewin & B.Mathew
  • Helleborus angustifolius Host
  • Helleborus brevicaulis Jord. & Fourr.
  • Helleborus liguricus M.Thomsen, McLewin & B.Mathew
  • Helleborus occidentalis Reut.
  • Helleborus pallidus Host
  • Helleborus personati Masclef
  • Helleborus vaginatus Kit. ex Steud.
  • Helleborus viridiflorus Stokes

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
  3. Wikidata. common name (P1843), joined on the World Flora Online identifier (P7715). CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-13.
  4. Kew, World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP v16). native distribution by TDWG level-3 botanical country, and life form. CC BY 3.0. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.