Grimmia piliferaP.Beauv.

grimmia dry rock moss

WFO wfo-0001173754 Accepted WFO 2026-06 4 photographs CC0 / CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–d · 2 observations

This species has been photographed under an open licence only 2 times, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.

Grimmia pilifera, photographed by Rafael Medina
fig. a Rafael Medina, CC BY 4.0 / 2016-05-21 / obs. 3760171

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 13 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Dryptodon pilifer (P.Beauv.) Ochyra & Żarnowiec
  • Grimmia apocarpa var. pilifera (P.Beauv.) Brid.
  • Grimmia arsenei Cardot
  • Grimmia atroviridis Cardot
  • Grimmia elatior var. squarrifolia Dixon & Thér.
  • Grimmia eurybasis Dixon & Sakurai
  • Grimmia hisauchii S.Okamura
  • Grimmia kirienensis C.Gao
  • Grimmia pensilvanica Schwägr.
  • Grimmia pensilvanica var. bestii Grout
  • Grimmia tenax Müll.Hal.
  • Racomitrium doii Sakurai
  • Weissia pilifera (P.Beauv.) Röhl.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
  3. Wikidata. common name (P1843), joined on the World Flora Online identifier (P7715). CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-13.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.