Euryops tenuissimus(L.) DC.

WFO wfo-0000093893 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Euryops tenuissimus, photographed by Tim Kirsten
fig. a Tim Kirsten, CC0 1.0 / 2021-10-25 / obs. 167255070
Euryops tenuissimus, photographed by Tony Rebelo
fig. b Tony Rebelo, CC BY-SA 4.0 / obs. 172785033
Euryops tenuissimus, photographed by Tony Rebelo
fig. c Tony Rebelo, CC BY-SA 4.0 / obs. 27165538
Euryops tenuissimus, photographed by Tony Rebelo
fig. d Tony Rebelo, CC BY-SA 4.0 / obs. 24720865
Euryops tenuissimus, photographed by Peter Warren
fig. e Peter Warren, CC0 1.0 / obs. 26778433
Euryops tenuissimus, photographed by Peter Warren
fig. f Peter Warren, CC0 1.0 / obs. 26786026
Euryops tenuissimus, photographed by Tony Rebelo
fig. g Tony Rebelo, CC BY-SA 4.0 / obs. 15672378
Euryops tenuissimus, photographed by Danie Palm
fig. h Danie Palm, CC BY 4.0 / obs. 172030725

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 8 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Euryops carnosus Cass.
  • Euryops khamiesbergensis Hutch.
  • Euryops longifolius Cass.
  • Euryops strictus DC.
  • Jacobaeastrum tenuissimum Kuntze
  • Othonna linifolia Burm.f.
  • Othonna tenuissima L.
  • Othonna trifurcata L.f.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.