Eurybia conspicua(Lindl.) G.L.Nesom

western showy aster

WFO wfo-0000007537 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC0 / CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Eurybia conspicua, photographed by Shane Johnson
fig. a Shane Johnson, CC0 1.0 / 2022-05-25 / obs. 202463184

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Native range 10 botanical countries

Regions where Eurybia conspicua is native: Alberta, British Columbia, Idaho, Manitoba, Montana, Oregon, Saskatchewan, South Dakota, Washington, Wyoming AlbertaBritish ColumbiaIdahoManitobaMontanaOregonSaskatchewanSouth DakotaWashingtonWyoming
Native distribution of Eurybia conspicua, after Kew’s World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Introduced, extinct and doubtful records are excluded, so this is where the plant is from, not everywhere it now grows.
RegionTDWG codeContinent
Alberta ABT NORTHERN AMERICA
British Columbia BRC
Idaho IDA
Manitoba MAN
Montana MNT
Oregon ORE
Saskatchewan SAS
South Dakota SDA
Washington WAS
Wyoming WYO

Region boundaries approximated from Natural Earth (public domain) and mapped to TDWG World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (WGSRPD) level-3 botanical countries (Brummitt 2001). Indicative, not the official WGSRPD geometry.

Flowering 257 in flower of 414 examined

Proportion of examined Eurybia conspicua in flower, by month
Month In flower Examined Share 95% interval
Jan 0 0 too few examined
Feb 0 0 too few examined
Mar 0 0 too few examined
Apr 0 1 too few examined
May 0 17 0% 0% to 18%
Jun 1 36 3% 0% to 14%
Jul 93 161 58% 50% to 65%
Aug 115 137 84% 77% to 89%
Sep 41 47 87% 75% to 94%
Oct 7 13 54% 29% to 77%
Nov 0 2 too few examined
Dec 0 0 too few examined

Peak flowering in Sep. Each bar is the share of Eurybia conspicua observations in which someone actually recorded the reproductive state and found the plant in flower, not the raw number of flowering records. That distinction matters: people observe plants far more in spring than in winter, so a bare count of flowering records partly measures when people go outside. Dividing by the number examined removes that. 257 of 414 examined observations were in flower, every one of them research grade. The whisker on each bar is a 95% Wilson interval. 6 months have fewer than 5 examined observations, so no proportion is drawn for them. This is still a global aggregate and not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres. Where a species has fewer than 30 flowering records we do not draw this chart at all. Computed from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Also published as 2 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Aster conspicuus Lindl.
  • Aster forwoodii S.Watson

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
  3. Wikidata. common name (P1843), joined on the World Flora Online identifier (P7715). CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-13.
  4. Kew, World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP v16). native distribution by TDWG level-3 botanical country, and life form. CC BY 3.0. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.