Ephemerum recurvifolium(Dicks.) Boulay

WFO wfo-0001166443 Accepted WFO 2026-06 7 photographs CC0 / CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–g · 3 observations

This species has been photographed under an open licence only 3 times, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.

Ephemerum recurvifolium, photographed by Jonathan Hughes
fig. a Jonathan Hughes, CC0 1.0 / 2021-02-09 / obs. 112574726

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 9 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Ephemerella pachycarpa (Schwägr.) Müll.Hal.
  • Ephemerella recurvifolia (Dicks.) Schimp.
  • Ephemerella recurvifolia var. angustifolia Lindb.
  • Ephemerum pachycarpum (Schwägr.) Hampe
  • Phascum dicksonii Brid.
  • Phascum pachycarpum Schwägr.
  • Phascum patens var. recurvifolium (Dicks.) Sm.
  • Phascum recurvifolium Dicks.
  • Physedium pachycarpum (Schwägr.) Müll.Hal.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.