Ectropothecium regulare(Brid.) A.Jaeger

WFO wfo-0001165670 Accepted WFO 2026-06 6 photographs CC BY-SA

Plate 1 figs. a–f · 2 observations

This species has been photographed under an open licence only 2 times, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.

Ectropothecium regulare, photographed by Nicola van Berkel
fig. a Nicola van Berkel, CC BY-SA 4.0 / 2016-07-08 / obs. 16004245

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 10 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Cupressina anotis Müll.Hal.
  • Cupressina crassicaulis Müll.Hal.
  • Ectropothecium anotis (Müll.Hal.) Broth. ex Paris
  • Ectropothecium nanocristacastrensis Müll.Hal. ex Renauld
  • Hypnum crassicaule (Müll.Hal.) Rehmann ex Paris
  • Hypnum cupressiforme var. regulare Brid.
  • Hypnum regulare (Brid.) Müll.Hal.
  • Rhaphidostegium anotis (Müll.Hal.) Paris
  • Stereodon crassicaulis (Müll.Hal.) Broth. ex Paris
  • Stereodon cupressiformis var. regularis (Brid.) Brid.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.