Dryopteris remota(A.Braun ex Döll) Druce

WFO wfo-1200105068 Accepted WFO 2026-06 4 photographs CC BY

Plate 1 figs. a–d · 1 observation

This species has been photographed under an open licence only 1 time, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.

Dryopteris remota, photographed by Thomas Ebner
fig. a Thomas Ebner, CC BY 4.0 / 2020-11-22 / obs. 105273869

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 14 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Aspidium filix-mas subsp. remotum (A.Braun ex Döll) P.E.Fourn.
  • Aspidium filix-mas var. remotum (A.Braun ex Döll) Jess.
  • Aspidium rigidum var. remotum A.Braun ex Döll
  • Dryopteris kemulariae Mikheladze
  • Dryopteris remota (A.Braun ex Döll) Hayek
  • Lastrea remota T.Moore
  • Nephrodium borbasio E.Walter
  • Nephrodium remoti Guétrot
  • Nephrodium remotum (A.Braun ex Döll) Murr
  • Nephrodium spinulosum (A.Braun) Baker
  • Nephrodium spinulosum prol. jordanii Rouy
  • Nephrodium spinulosum subsp. jordanii (Rouy) P.E.Fourn.
  • Nephrodium spinulosum subsp. remotum (A.Braun ex Döll) G.Hensl.
  • Polystichum remotum (A.Braun ex Döll) P.E.Fourn.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.