Digitaria sanguinalis(L.) Scop.

crab-grass, hairy finger-grasshairy crabgrass

WFO wfo-0000864353 Accepted WFO 2026-06 8 photographs CC BY / CC BY-SA

Plate 1 figs. a–h · 8 separate observations

Digitaria sanguinalis, photographed by Jon Sullivan
fig. a Jon Sullivan, CC BY 4.0 / 2022-04-30 / obs. 195567253

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Native range 72 botanical countries

Regions where Digitaria sanguinalis is native: Algeria, Azores, Burundi, Canary Is., Cape Verde, Chad, Egypt, Libya, Madeira, Morocco, Sudan-South Sudan, Tunisia, Afghanistan, China North-Central, China South-Central, China Southeast, Cyprus, East Aegean Is., Gulf States, Inner Mongolia, Iran, Iraq, Kazakhstan, Kirgizstan, Lebanon-Syria, Manchuria, North Caucasus, Palestine, Saudi Arabia, Sinai, Tadzhikistan, Taiwan, Tibet, Transcaucasus, Türkiye, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang, Andaman Is., Bangladesh, Bismarck Archipelago, Borneo, East Himalaya, India, Laccadive Is., Maldives, Myanmar, Nicobar Is., Pakistan, Philippines, South China Sea, Vietnam, West Himalaya, Albania, Baleares, Bulgaria, Corse, France, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Kriti, Krym, NW. Balkan Pen., Portugal, Romania, Sardegna, Sicilia, South European Russia, Spain, Türkiye-in-Europe, Ukraine AlgeriaBurundiChadEgyptLibyaMoroccoSudan-South SudanTunisiaAfghanistanChina North-CentralChina South-CentralChina SoutheastCyprusEast Aegean Is.Gulf StatesInner MongoliaIranIraqKazakhstanKirgizstanLebanon-SyriaManchuriaNorth CaucasusPalestineSaudi ArabiaSinaiTadzhikistanTaiwanTibetTranscaucasusTürkiyeTurkmenistanUzbekistanXinjiangBangladeshBismarck ArchipelagoBorneoEast HimalayaIndiaMyanmarPakistanPhilippinesVietnamWest HimalayaAlbaniaBulgariaCorseFranceGreeceHungaryItalyKritiKrymNW. Balkan Pen.PortugalRomaniaSiciliaSouth European RussiaSpainTürkiye-in-EuropeUkraine AzoresCanary Is.Cape VerdeMadeiraAndaman Is.Laccadive Is.MaldivesNicobar Is.South China SeaBalearesSardegna
Native distribution of Digitaria sanguinalis, after Kew’s World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Introduced, extinct and doubtful records are excluded, so this is where the plant is from, not everywhere it now grows. Regions too small to draw at this scale are marked with a dot.
RegionTDWG codeContinent
Afghanistan AFG ASIA-TEMPERATE
China North-Central CHN
China South-Central CHC
China Southeast CHS
Cyprus CYP
East Aegean Is. EAI
Gulf States GST
Inner Mongolia CHI
Iran IRN
Iraq IRQ
Kazakhstan KAZ
Kirgizstan KGZ
Lebanon-Syria LBS
Manchuria CHM
North Caucasus NCS
Palestine PAL
Saudi Arabia SAU
Sinai SIN
Tadzhikistan TZK
Taiwan TAI
Tibet CHT
Transcaucasus TCS
Türkiye TUR
Turkmenistan TKM
Uzbekistan UZB
Xinjiang CHX
Albania ALB EUROPE
Baleares BAL
Bulgaria BUL
Corse COR
France FRA
Greece GRC
Hungary HUN
Italy ITA
Kriti KRI
Krym KRY
NW. Balkan Pen. YUG
Portugal POR
Romania ROM
Sardegna SAR
Sicilia SIC
South European Russia RUS
Spain SPA
Türkiye-in-Europe TUE
Ukraine UKR
Andaman Is. AND ASIA-TROPICAL
Bangladesh BAN
Bismarck Archipelago BIS
Borneo BOR
East Himalaya EHM
India IND
Laccadive Is. LDV
Maldives MDV
Myanmar MYA
Nicobar Is. NCB
Pakistan PAK
Philippines PHI
South China Sea SCS
Vietnam VIE
West Himalaya WHM
Algeria ALG AFRICA
Azores AZO
Burundi BUR
Canary Is. CNY
Cape Verde CVI
Chad CHA
Egypt EGY
Libya LBY
Madeira MDR
Morocco MOR
Sudan-South Sudan SUD
Tunisia TUN

Region boundaries approximated from Natural Earth (public domain) and mapped to TDWG World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions (WGSRPD) level-3 botanical countries (Brummitt 2001). Indicative, not the official WGSRPD geometry.

Flowering 102 in flower of 167 examined

Proportion of examined Digitaria sanguinalis in flower, by month
Month In flower Examined Share 95% interval
Jan 9 11 82% 52% to 95%
Feb 6 11 55% 28% to 79%
Mar 6 12 50% 25% to 75%
Apr 6 10 60% 31% to 83%
May 1 1 too few examined
Jun 4 5 80% 38% to 96%
Jul 21 26 81% 62% to 91%
Aug 24 39 62% 46% to 75%
Sep 18 34 53% 37% to 69%
Oct 2 12 17% 5% to 45%
Nov 0 1 too few examined
Dec 5 5 100% 57% to 100%

Peak flowering in Dec. Each bar is the share of Digitaria sanguinalis observations in which someone actually recorded the reproductive state and found the plant in flower, not the raw number of flowering records. That distinction matters: people observe plants far more in spring than in winter, so a bare count of flowering records partly measures when people go outside. Dividing by the number examined removes that. 102 of 167 examined observations were in flower, every one of them research grade. The whisker on each bar is a 95% Wilson interval. 2 months have fewer than 5 examined observations, so no proportion is drawn for them. This is still a global aggregate and not a forecast for your garden: the same species flowers on different dates in different hemispheres. Where a species has fewer than 30 flowering records we do not draw this chart at all. Computed from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Where it actually grows measured, from 2,001 observations

Condition 5th percentile Median 95th percentile
Coldest month, mean daily low -10.8 °C -2.3 °C 9.0 °C
Warmest month, mean daily high 21.0 °C 24.6 °C 30.6 °C
Annual rainfall 504 mm 764 mm 1,985 mm
Rainfall in the driest quarter 68 mm 133 mm 278 mm

It is found where winters bring hard frost. This is not care advice and it is not a forecast. It is a measurement: we sampled the climate at every one of the 2,001 research-grade observations of Digitaria sanguinalis that carry a coordinate, and this is the range those places actually span. The 5th and 95th percentiles are used rather than the minimum and maximum, because a single cultivated specimen in a heated conservatory should not widen a tropical plant's range to the Arctic.

This is not a hardiness zone. A USDA zone is the average annual extreme minimum temperature. The figure above is the mean daily minimum of the coldest month, which is a different quantity and is typically far warmer. Reading one as the other would place a plant several zones too warm, so we do not publish a hardiness zone, because we do not have one. Climate from CHELSA V2.1 (Karger et al. 2017); occurrences from 10.15468/dl.cgje2x.

Also published as 99 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Asperella digitaria Lam.
  • Cynodon praecox (Walter) Roem. & Schult.
  • Dactilon sanguinale (L.) Vill.
  • Digitaria aegyptiaca Willd.
  • Digitaria aegyptiaca subsp. caucasica (Henrard) Tzvelev
  • Digitaria australis Willd. ex Trin.
  • Digitaria caucasica Henrard
  • Digitaria ciliaris f. intercedens Beck
  • Digitaria ciliaris var. intercedens Beck
  • Digitaria eriogona (Schrad.) Link
  • Digitaria gracilis Guss.
  • Digitaria intermedia Gennari
  • Digitaria ischaemum var. esculenta Gaudin
  • Digitaria ischaemum var. praecox (Walter) Heynh.
  • Digitaria nealleyi Henrard
  • Digitaria nervosa Roem. & Schult.
  • Digitaria panicea Willd. ex Steud.
  • Digitaria pectiniformis (Henrard) Tzvelev
  • Digitaria pilosa Pieri
  • Digitaria plebeia Phil.
  • Digitaria praecox (Walter) Willd.
  • Digitaria sabulosa Tzvelev
  • Digitaria sanguinalis f. chlorantha (Kuntze) Soó
  • Digitaria sanguinalis f. composita (Waisb.) Soó

and 75 more.

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.
  3. Wikidata. common name (P1843), joined on the World Flora Online identifier (P7715). CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-13.
  4. Kew, World Checklist of Vascular Plants (WCVP v16). native distribution by TDWG level-3 botanical country, and life form. CC BY 3.0. Retrieved 2026-06-04.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite.