Cuspidaria sceptrum(Cham.) L.G.Lohmann

WFO wfo-0000782523 Accepted WFO 2026-06 4 photographs CC0

Plate 1 figs. a–d · 1 observation

This species has been photographed under an open licence only 1 time, so some figures below are different views of the same plant, taken on the same day, rather than different individuals. They are usually different parts of it: the leaf, the flower, the bark.

Cuspidaria sceptrum, photographed by Tsssss
fig. a Tsssss, CC0 1.0 / 2020-06-16 / obs. 93178892

Every figure is a research-grade observation under CC0, CC BY or CC BY-SA, rehosted with the photographer’s name, the licence and the observation it came from. Photographs under a NonCommercial licence are excluded from this site and are never stored, which costs us a great many pictures and is not negotiable.

Also published as 16 synonyms

A synonym is not an error. It is a record of botanists disagreeing, in print, about where this plant belongs. Each of these was somebody’s considered answer.

  • Alsocydia glutinosa Mart. ex DC.
  • Arrabidaea sceptrum (Cham.) Sandwith
  • Bignonia cujabana DC.
  • Bignonia glutinosa DC.
  • Bignonia glutinosa var. angustifolia Mart. ex DC.
  • Bignonia sceptrum Cham.
  • Cremastus angustifolius (Mart. ex DC.) Miers
  • Cremastus glutinosa (DC.) Miers
  • Cremastus glutinosus (DC.) Miers
  • Cremastus glutinosus var. angustifolius (Mart. ex DC.) Bureau
  • Cremastus sanctae-annae S.Moore
  • Cremastus sceptrum (Cham.) Bureau & K.Schum.
  • Cremastus sceptrum var. angustifolia (Mart. ex DC.) Bureau & K.Schum.
  • Cremastus sceptrum var. latifolia Bureau & K.Schum.
  • Cremastus sceptrum var. longipes Bureau & K.Schum.
  • Petastoma sceptrum (Cham.) Miers

Sourcesevery claim on this page

  1. World Flora Online Plant List. accepted name, authority, classification. CC0. Retrieved 2026-07-12.
  2. iNaturalist. photographs and flowering annotations, CC0 / CC BY / CC BY-SA only. per photograph. Retrieved 2026-06-27.

We publish what we can source and we say so when we cannot. This page has no care advice and no toxicity claim, because we do not yet have those from a source we can cite. It has no native range either: Kew's checklist does not cover this taxon.